Taking Tool Grinding In-House | Quality Digest


Jeremy St. Pierre led the creation of an in-house tool grinding operation at GKN Aerospace Engine that paid for itself in only two years. Image provided by ZOLLER.

Faster turnaround

Thanks,
Quality Digest

منبع: https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/metrology-article/taking-tool-grinding-house-122123.html

Conversely, St. Pierre cautioned, many of these tools are complex, with unequal indexing and variable helices, and many outside vendors don’t want to regrind these tools unless they made them originally. So if you can’t regrind them yourself, you’re locked into a limited supply, which is a costly and potentially risky place to be.

St. Pierre also referenced situations in which the operator may be unsure of how to make an adjustment. “We’ll use the ZOLLER to make the measurement and send it back to the grinding program to make corrections. It’s nice that they can speak to each other pretty easily, and it wasn’t too hard to set up…. We’ve used it on more advanced tooling where there are so many parameters that one thing can affect the other. So we let the ZOLLER help us with those.”

GKN also has a stand-alone wheel dresser to condition the wheels offline. But as mentioned earlier, if it’s an unmanned shift, the MX machines can be both grinding and measuring the tools in process, plus measuring and dressing the wheels. Meanwhile, the ZOLLER would be performing finished tool inspection on previously ground tools.

Other ancillary equipment

St. Pierre’s tool room is attached to GKN’s Aerospace Engine plant in Newington, Connecticut, but it’s run as a separate profit center. They service all seven GKN Aerospace Engine sites in North America, plus they sell tools to other local aerospace companies. They’ve even been able to bring in outside work for other companies to add revenue. It’s a sideline for GKN, but it’s also worth considering this possibility when deciding to pursue in-house tool grinding.

Choosing the right grinder

Having said that, St. Pierre recognizes that GKN is a large company that spent a fortune on tools, so starting smaller makes more sense for many companies. He also suggested taking a close look at the “easy wins,” the tools that are both important and doable, “before you say, ‘We can bring in everything.’” Then you can confidently specify the grinder and associated gear, and see if the numbers work.

Whether you use a lot of cutting tools or sometimes find yourself desperately lacking the right tool, you’ve probably considered making your own—or at least sharpening your worn tools. But how do you decide if taking tool grinding in-house is the smart decision? It’s a question GKN Aerospace Engine faced, and principal manufacturing engineer Jeremy St. Pierre walks us through the considerations. Plus, he offers priceless advice on best practices if you make the leap.

Cost savings lead to two-year payback

CNC tool grinders and the required ancillary equipment represent a significant investment. So GKN’s management asked St. Pierre to study its tool consumption and project the potential savings it could achieve by taking tool grinding in-house. One key factor, explained St. Pierre, was the fact that many of the tools could be reground multiple times. For example, he pointed to tapered ball-nose end mills, which can be sharpened to the desired “true form, every time.”

However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads.

Both systems use Schunk hydraulic chucks that clamp different diameters with the insertion of an intermediate sleeve. In GKN’s case, a robot changes out the sleeve. As St. Pierre says, “The roboSet (or the MX7 loader) has all the sleeves already inside and knows where they are. Let’s say Batch No. 1 is a 1/2 in. tool. The robot will grab the 1/2 in. sleeve and load it into the chuck. Then it will run all those 1/2 in. tools and do the required reporting. Once that’s done, it’ll swap sleeves, grab the next size tool, and then start running that program. You just have to write the program and select your schedule.” GKN customized its pallets to hold five different sizes, and St. Pierre said that they can run 20 different tool designs through the ZOLLER in one unmanned shift.

Metrology

Taking Tool Grinding In-House

How one aerospace supplier reduced CNC tool costs

You might think that an in-house grinding shop wouldn’t make better cutting tools than the specialized manufacturers. But owing to its focus on GKN, and St. Pierre’s willingness to experiment, the team has in fact “beaten out a fair amount of tooling from other very well-known tool manufacturers,” says St. Pierre. “Not that that’s our intention. It’s just that we’re able to really focus on our operations and our products, and customize a tool for that production environment. We have the ability to tweak tooling just for us.”

Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.

Published: Thursday, December 21, 2023 – 12:03

St. Pierre also found that some of GKN’s high-volume tools were very expensive just because they weren’t standard in the industry. “Instead of having a 0.50 in. cutter, we might have a 0.485 in. cutter diameter. Because that technically is a custom, we were paying a premium and ordering 12 weeks of tooling. And we had long lead times.” By calculating the true cost of tooling, including the frequency with which GKN had to “send out 70 tools at once to get a good price,” St. Pierre was able to make a strong case for investing in an even-more capable tool room than originally envisioned, with four ANCA MX7 linear tool grinders, a ZOLLER »titan« measuring machine, and a full complement of support equipment like a wheel dresser and a drag finisher. Yet the payback time turned out to be just two years.

One surprising discovery St. Pierre reported was being able to eliminate the need for coating on many of their tools by instead honing the cutting edge in an OTEC drag finishing machine. “Our tools are lasting longer edge-prepped than they were coated,” St. Pierre says. “We do coat many of our tools if they’re being used for high-temp machining. But we make a lot of tapered balls for »titan«ium, and weve done a lot of testing. We just edge-prep a tool, and it lasts. Sometimes we’ve had four times the life of previous tools.”

Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types.

GKN is also beginning to use the ZOLLER to measure the grinding wheels, which again maximizes the MX’s productivity. “We’re getting the equipment in to set up the ZOLLER to do all the wheel measurements, so we can set up a whole batch and then just streamline data into the grinders,” says St. Pierre.

GKN opted to add robot loaders to all its ANCA MX7 tool grinders, plus internal wheel dressing and measuring. The machines also have an integrated laser that can scan a tool profile and automatically compensate in the grinding program to correct for any deviations from the nominal form. These features combine to enable the machines to produce tight tolerance tools throughout an unmanned shift. “We hold ourselves to plus nothing and minus a half thou on our tools,” says St. Pierre. “And a tighter tolerance on some tools. If it’s a ball nose for finish machining, we’ll hold to a couple of tenths.”

It should be emphasized that although St. Pierre had years of manufacturing and problem-solving experience when he started the project at GKN, he’d never ground a tool. That also holds true for everyone who joined the team thereafter. “I hired people that I knew were mechanically inclined and understood the real world and how you shouldn’t overcomplicate things,” says St. Pierre. “They were all nervous at first, but the first thing we did was fly out to Michigan for two weeks of training with ANCA. And then we started running.” They’ve been learning ever since, and made some mistakes, he says. But only once have they sent out a tool that failed.

The ZOLLER »titan« also has a robot loader, which ZOLLER calls the »roboSet2«. What’s more, all four grinders plus the measuring machine can automatically change tool diameter during lights-out operation. That’s important, says St. Pierre, because they make “400 different part numbers for GKN. We’re not making batches of 1,000; we’re making batches of 15–20.” And with very few exceptions, they have to inspect between 10 and 100% of all their tools. So flexible workholding is essential to prevent a bottleneck.

“That way we can help each other out,” says St. Pierre. “We can send programs to each other, we’re grinding the same way…. If they need us to make some tools, they can send us a program, we can run the tools, ship them back, and the tools are exactly as if they’d made them there.”

In addition to the higher performance, St. Pierre says, edge-prepping also eliminates the roughly one-week lead time required for coating, plus that cost and the extra shipping and handling. “A regrind might cost $5 or $100,” he says. “But if it’s a $5 regrind, it’s still a $10 coating. Now you’re basically at three times the tool cost. We can eliminate that with a process that takes a few seconds.” (GKN’s average honing time is about a minute, and the OTEC processes 25 tools at a time, according to St. Pierre.)

Independent profit center

Add ZOLLER’s TMS tool management software, a 3D printer for robot grippers and other tooling, a Modula VLM storage tower, and a laser marker, and you’ll see that GKN’s tool room is as self-sufficient as it is efficient.

GKN uses ANCA tooling software to produce highly detailed prints of its tools, “instead of just the dummy solids that the industry is used to,” says St. Pierre. “So we’re able to include all the parameters of the actual physical tool and how it’s designed.” These prints then dictate the inspection routine. “On a standard tool, we go through 22 to 30 different parameters…. But we make a lot of variable index, variable helix tools, so we have to check every flute, especially on a setup.” St. Pierre added that a full, detailed inspection “might take 10 minutes, but you can customize those programs and get it under a minute to check” a subset of specific features.

More on the ANCA-ZOLLER partnership

St. Pierre raved about ANCA’s software: “All their stuff, whether it’s recalibrating, recommissioning, reteaching a position when you’re doing automation, it really walks you through. It’s the most user-friendly machine I’ve ever used. I can take someone from the floor who’s never seen the machine, and they can make a tool within half an hour. Design one on the machine and grind it without knowing what they’re doing.”

And the right measuring machine

So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site.

If you’re ready to take the plunge into tool grinding, the next most important consideration is which tool grinder you should invest in. Naturally, ease of use and support are key factors, and it’s wise to think beyond the machine builder. Ask your current suppliers what machines they use and whether they are willing to share programs or offer other assistance. For GKN, ANCA was a clear choice because it’s a market leader and the Swedish operation had ANCA machines.

St. Pierre summarizes his approach as “push things until they break and then dial it back to make that best tool.” They’ll try tools at the attached GKN plant if there are idle machines, or send them to GKN’s Swedish location, where they have a dedicated testing machine and can provide immediate feedback. They’ll also give sample tools to companies they’ve worked with over the years and ask for their input.

It was “a lot of work” and a big investment. But, St. Pierre says, “No one’s looking at this project saying it was a bad investment. Everyone says they wish we had done this earlier.”