It all began in the 1940s when an entrepreneur began selling AD-X2, a chemical additive that he claimed would extend the life of car batteries. But at the National Bureau of Standards, the federal agency now known as NIST, scientists had evidence showing that the additive was ineffective. Then the showdown began.
Published: Thursday, January 4, 2024 – 12:00
Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types.
Metrology
Now Online: The AD-X2 Controversy
During the 1940s, scientific integrity was put into question by a packet of salt
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
What came next is a story of scientific tests, government hearings, firings, rehirings, a media firestorm, and much, much more… all, as actor Sean Astin—whose grandfather, the scientist Allen V. Astin, led the agency at the time—put it, “over batteries?”
However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads.
This is the story of an agency fighting to defend the principle of scientific integrity and of a public servant standing up to do what is right while under attack in politics and the news media.
(NIST: Gaithersburg, MD) — The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a documentary, The AD-X2 Controversy, that highlights a moment in history when scientific integrity came under attack.