Leave Intuition to the Machines

In his best-selling book, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013), Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman brought to the mainstream the concept of two distinct modes of human thought. “System 1” thinking is fast, intuitive, instinctive, yet prone to mistakes in unfamiliar circumstances. “System 2” thinking, on the other hand, is slow, intentional, and better able to conquer new situations by applying rules that it has learned in the past. 

This is where System 1 thinking kicks off the process for most managers. Their years of experience in a context may have generated insights that operate subconsciously, producing what we think of as managerial intuition. But what if, rather than relying solely on their gut instinct for the initial selection, managers enlisted a large language model (LLM) to sift through the myriad initial options and generate a short list of feasible alternatives? A list generated by an LLM could be both larger and begin with a larger candidate pool. 

So, what does this mean for managerial work? We predict that the blend of artificial intelligence (AI) and human thought will remain indispensable—at least for now—but with an unexpected twist. Far from being limited to grunt work, AI will be entrusted with some of the more creative and intuitive components of decision-making, tasks viewed as fundamentally human. It won’t replace managerial work but rather reshape it.

Two styles of thinking: fast and slow

Though the ability to pivot between System 1 and System 2 has long been emphasized in decision-making research, with debate over how well humans are able to do so, it’s not generally seen as its own system. Yet if System 1 and System 2 tasks are carried out by AI, this pivoting between the two—call it System 3—is where human intelligence comes into play. 

Quality Digest

منبع: https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/innovation-article/leave-intuition-machines-020624.html

However, this process is iterative and doesn’t end with one cycle. The strict application of rules to the short-listed candidates might expose flaws in both the short list and the applied rules. The ability to identify these shortcomings and fine-tune both the short list creation and the selection process exemplifies quintessential System 3 thinking. 

This development allowed Alphabet’s AlphaGo in 2016 to triumph over Lee Sedol, the top player at Go, a game that humans were supposed to always dominate because intuitive play is crucial to success. 

Combining thinking styles across humans and AI

We believe that this form of thinking is where human managers should invest their skill development efforts. It presents an exciting fusion of human cognitive flexibility in harnessing “machine precision” with “machine intuition,” maximizing the strengths of both, and mitigating their weaknesses. The metaphorical image we have is that of a human charioteer guiding the twin steeds of machine precision and machine intuition, yoked together to produce rapid progress in decision-making.

How will humans work alongside AI? The fundamental premise of most narratives is that tasks can be divided into subtasks that humans and machines undertake based on their relative strengths. Photo credit: Temple Cerulean on Unsplash.

However, the advent of machine learning brought forth a novel variant of machine intelligence. It demands extensive training on data, after which it operates almost instantly. While notoriously opaque, its workings are remarkably effective on average. We argue that this mirrors humans’ System 1 thinking: Human intuition is built on years of experience but operates almost instantly.

Published Jan. 15, 2024, by INSEAD.

As it stands, humans hold both an absolute and relative edge in this System 3 form of thought. They can identify when a process needs to be changed and select between different options and analyses. The durability of this advantage remains uncertain as advancements in computer science seem poised to combine traditional computation with machine learning. However, it’s evident that humans will remain the sole masters of System 3 thinking for a substantial window of time.

What does it mean for managers?

To bring this idea to life, let’s consider a classic managerial dilemma: “Which project should I invest in among several options?” Some process of funneling is necessary to go from a large set of projects to a smaller set that bears closer examination. The projects could be candidates for recruitment, potential partners for a strategic alliance, or takeover targets. Conversely, creating a large enough list of initial candidates (ideation) is also important to ensure a good coverage of the possibilities. Given the vast data associated with various projects, some of which may not be easily processed, some form of intuition or judgment can be helpful, particularly under time pressure. 

So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site.

With sufficient practice, the acquired skills of System 2 become embedded in the intuition of System 1 in a sort of virtuous cycle.  

Just two months after its launch in late 2022, ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users. Along with other advanced language models, it quickly began encroaching on territory traditionally exempt from automation, such as tasks requiring creativity, intuition, and decision-making.

Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.

How will humans work alongside AI? The fundamental premise of most narratives is that tasks can be divided into subtasks that humans and machines undertake based on their relative strengths. This line of reasoning echoes enduring principles behind specialization, outsourcing, offshoring, and strategic alliances.