Improving Seawater Straining to Cool Power Plants

Although coastal power plants have long used ocean water for cooling, maintaining strainers has been challenging due to the size range of particles and debris that must be filtered out, as well as the corrosive effect of seawater. Using automated scraper strainers along with FRP construction can cost-effectively help to improve both equipment longevity and production.

Pointing out the ultimate benefit of using an effective automatic strainer, Williams says, “Using an automatic strainer minimizes the required maintenance to keep it operational and helps to maximize production uptime. The larger the facility, the greater the benefit.”

Innovation

Improving Seawater Straining to Cool Power Plants

Automated scraper strainers minimize maintenance and boost production

Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.

A composite material made up of polymer supported with fibers for added strength, FRP is already widely used for the power-plant piping used to carry seawater for once-through process cooling. Due to FRP’s strength, the material can also be used to build to ASME BPVC Section X standards, which establish requirements for fabricating FRP pressure vessels. Acme has already used FRP for pressure vessel applications up to 300 psi.

The automatic scraper strainer from Acme Engineering, a North American manufacturer of industrial self-cleaning strainers, is a motorized unit designed to continually remove both very large and very small suspended solids from cooling water. Cleaning is accomplished by a spring-loaded blade and brush system managed by a fully automatic control system.

Along the coasts and in many countries, seawater is widely used for cooling systems at power plants, as well as for some mining and industrial processes. The challenge, however, is that strainers must sufficiently filter out both small particles (e.g., sand, silt, suspended solids) and larger detritus (seaweed, aquatic life, marine debris) to reduce the risk of fouled processes and production downtime. In addition, strainers must be designed to resist corrosive seawater. Fortunately, advanced strainer design and alternative construction materials can dramatically reduce fouling and corrosion while cutting costs.

However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads.

Thanks,
Quality Digest

منبع: https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/innovation-article/improving-seawater-straining-cool-power-plants-080323.html

“Unlike a manual strainer, you do not have to open and clean it,” he says. “No one has to manually blow down solids. Since it is automatic, it is essentially a set-and-forget type of system that lets you walk away and focus on other aspects of your facility.”

So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site.

In response, the industry has developed automatic self-cleaning scrapers that filter out both tiny particles and large debris. This virtually eliminates manual maintenance as well as equipment clogging and fouling issues downstream, which helps to minimize production downtime.

Blowdown occurs only at the end of the intermittent scraping cycle, when a valve is opened for a few seconds to remove solids from the collector area. Liquid loss is well below 1% of total flow.

Of course, seawater can be highly corrosive to the strainers used to protect the plant’s process-cooling equipment. Typical strainers constructed of carbon steel or even stainless steel quickly deteriorate when exposed to salty, corrosive seawater for extended periods. For this reason, costly duplex stainless steel (with chromium content up to 22%) and super-duplex stainless steel (with chromium content up to 25%) are often used for greater corrosion resistance. However, even with the added expense, virtually continuous exposure to seawater can still lead to corrosion issues.