The success run theorem is one of the most common statistical rationales for sample sizes used for attribute data. Credit: Mathieu Turle on Unsplash.

Having zero failures out of 22 samples, we can be 90% confident that the process is at least 90% reliable (or at least 90% of the population is conforming).

p(rejecting the lot) = 1 – p(22 conforming products in a row) = 1 – 0.10 = 0.90 = 90%

*Quality Digest* does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and *Quality Digest* supports businesses of all types.

n * ln(R) = ln(1 – C)

It goes in the form of:

Using the multiplication rule of probability:

Or R^n = 1 – C

So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site.

Or:

Published: Monday, August 28, 2023 – 12:03

Let’s assume that *q* is the conforming rate (probability of finding a good part).

The derivation is straightforward and we can use the multiplication rule of probability to derive it. Let’s assume that we have a lot of infinite size, and we are testing random samples out of the lot. The infinite size of the lot ensures independence of the samples. If the lot was finite and small, then the probability of finding good (i.e., conforming) or bad (nonconforming) parts will change from sample to sample if we’re not replacing the tested sample back into the lot.

The formula for the success run theorem is given as:

*First published July 4, 2023, in Harish’s Notebook.*

Taking logarithms of both sides:

Any statistic we calculate should reflect our lack of knowledge of the parameter of the population. Using the confidence/reliability statement is one way of doing it. I’m calling this the *epistemic humility dictum*:

In other words, C = 1 – R^n.

However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in *Quality Digest* apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads.

This can also be stated as the *confidence* that if the lot is passing our inspection (if we found zero rejects), then the lot is at least 90% conforming.

Our PROMISE: *Quality Digest *only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.

Using the example, if we tested 22 samples from a lot, and there were zero rejects, then we can with 90% confidence say that the lot is at least 90% conforming. This is also a form of lot tolerance percent defective (LTPD) sampling in acceptance sampling. We can get the same results using an OC curve.

The success run theorem is one of the most common statistical rationales for sample sizes used for attribute data.

Thanks,

Quality Digest

منبع: https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/lean-article/deriving-success-run-theorem-082823.html

Let’s calculate the probability of finding 22 conforming products in a row. In other words, we’re testing 22 random samples, and we want to determine the probability of finding 22 good parts. This is also the probability of *not* finding any bad product in the 22 random samples. For ease of explanation, let’s assume that *q* = 0.9, or 90%. This rate of conforming product can also be notated as the reliability, *R*.

p(22 conforming products in a row) = 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.9 …

x 0.9 = 0.9 ^22 = 0.10 = 10%

Any statistical statement we make should reflect our lack of knowledge of the “true” value/nature of the parameter we’re interested in.

Having zero failures out of 59 samples, we can be 95% confident that the process is at least 95% reliable (or at least of 95% of the population is conforming)*.*

If we find zero rejects in the 22 samples, we’re also going to accept the lot. Therefore, this is also the probability of accepting the lot.

n = ln(1 – C)/ ln(R)*, *where* n *is the sample size*, nl *is the natural logarithm*, C *is the confidence level*, *and* R *is reliability*.*

Or n = ln(1 – C)/ln(R)

Using a similar approach, we can derive a one-sided, nonparametric tolerance interval. If we test 22 samples, we can say with 90% confidence level that at least 90% of the population is above the smallest value of the samples tested.

Lean

## Deriving the Success Run Theorem

### Any statistical statement we make should reflect our lack of knowledge

The complement of this is the probability of *not* finding 22 conforming products in a row, or the probability of finding at least one nonconforming product in the 22 samples. This is also the probability of rejecting the lot.